argument essay 4 free write

Argument argument argument argument misinformation in the media is a huge issue affecting all citizens of this country. Misinformation can be found is social media and on tv. People are brainwashed to think a certain piece of information is true when in reality, the fact nay have been altered or completely switched. Misinformation affects voters who listen to the misinformation and believe that it is true and go to the voting polls with that false information in mind. They vote for people or policies based on the information they have gathered and may possibly vote for something they would not normally vote for. This is dangerous to democrat since voters are not voting for what they truly want for this country but what someone else had said. Republic Democracy was established in the united states as the main government type through the founding fathers because they wanted to know what their citizens wanted for their country while the officials would work for the people. Misinformation switches the roles of having the government officials telling citizens what they believe is correct and hav e the people work for the government. My head hurts so much and with all this clicking I hear it is just making it worse so I dont feel like typing anything more.

I hate the government and anything to do with politics because everything is so corrupt nowadays. The government abuses the powers that they were given by spreading misinformation to innocent citizens. I believe the main reason for corruption in the government is because people are misinformed on many topics.

Research Question: Is intentional misinformation spread by politicians and other people detrimental to American democracy?

Working thesis: Misinformation can mislead citizens to make crucial decisions by relying on false information, potentially leading them to making a vote they might not normally make which is why misinformation is a threat to Americans and American democracy.

Reasons:
- Politicians; global warming
- People outside U.S.; pizzagate, Germany
- Noncredible sources within the country; welfare, two newspapers about voting

Counterargument: not everyone remembers what they see or hear??

article paragraph

When I first opened the article and read the headline, "No, you're not entitled to your own opinion", I felt very confused. In school, we are generally taught to respect each others' opinions even if we do not agree with them or if they're wrong. We are not supposed to judge other people's characters due to their beliefs. When reading the article, I began to understand how come it is dangerous to say this. If we just allow people to believe something that is wrong without trying to convey them in the right direction, no one will want to learn true facts because they are so stubborn. People need to come to the realization that sometimes their initial view on something may be incorrect and that it is okay to admit that they're wrong and learn what is right. By telling people they are entitled to their opinions, we are creating a safe spot for them to be able to hold false beliefs. This in a way can lead to the cause of misinformation that is spread in American democracy. We tell people it is okay to have the incorrect belief, but then they go out and act to persuade people that what they believe is correct. An example would be global warming. It has been scientifically proven that global warming is a serious issue in our environment. Some people say it is not happening in sake of covering their fears. Because of this, there is misinformation saying that global warming is a conspiracy, which is far from the truth.

White Paper #4 constitution

This was my first time ever actually reading the U.S. Constitution. In school we learned about the preamble along with the 27 amendments, but never addressed what the rest of the constitution has written. The Constitution in Article I Section 2 mentions that “The House of Representatives… shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” but does not expand on the process of impeachment or defines clearly what that exactly means. I thought the Constitution would describe how the whole process should look like and under what circumstances can an elected official be impeached. The impeachment process seems to be very difficult and specific, yet none of that is explained during this section of the Constitution.  The only part that is explained is when the President is being held on trial, but not about what happens before the hearing.

            When reading Article II in the Constitution, the way I understand the election of the Vice President, they have as if their own election but on the same ballot as the presidential candidate. The Constitution states in Article II Section I states, “In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall choose from them by Ballot the Vice-President” meaning that the Vice President is also voted on. This process seems to have changed over time since now the presidential candidate seems to select their own vice president candidate to run with them in the elections. For example, if someone in the 2016 election were to have selected Donald Trump to be president, they would also have selected his running mate, Mike Pence, to be vice president.

Argument free write

An argument is when a biased topic is presented and a person takes a stance on the issue based on the researched that has been done and explains how come they believe this certain way about the issue. There are no right or wrong answers as long as there are facts that back up the opinion that has been concluded. Arguments does not mean bashing the reader or audience’s personality for example telling them that they are stupid for not agreeing with you. Instead you present facts that conclude that your opinion is the opinion that the audience should hold. Arguments should be well supported and analysis must be done to show the connection between the citation and your opinion on the topic. Overall, you are trying to convince the audience to agree with you through the use of factual evidence. evidence needs to support claim being made

White Paper #3

When elected as a the new President of the United States, there are high expectations placed on the new official. The President is understood as the main representation of the government and its people. The president is supposed to consider the needs of the country and not their own opinions. Donald Trump has avoided the voices of millions citizens, therefore misrepresenting Americans. In my opinion Donald Trump should be impeached, but more research and evidence is needed to remove him officially from office.

Americans may believe that it was a mistake to put Trump into the Oval Office, but there needs to be cold hard facts in order to be able to even think about removing a high official. According to Vox’s Ezra Klein, if America had just incidentally put Trump into office and Trump does not turn out to be either a criminal nor incapable medically to perform his tasks as President of the United States it can be very difficult and dangerous to remove him. Ezra further quotes Representative Brad Sherman explaining that citizens would want physical evidence of the crime Trump is considered to be part of (Klein). Without any proof of misdemeanor, America is stuck with an official they thought would be great for our country. It is very rare to impeach a president as it is only used for extreme cases, therefore it is difficult to part take such actions with Trump without proof of extreme criminal activity about President Trump or medical proof of being misfit as a leader of a country.

There has been ongoing research to find reasons to impeach President Trump. Representative Steve Cohen presents in his speech the five articles of impeachment against Trump including money he has been borrowing from other countries or making on the side despite his salary as President. Cohen explains that there has been viewings of his criminal records, but none of it is considered an “impeachable defense”(Cohen). This just shows that there is not any sufficient evidence to impeach Trump at the moment. There are only belief reasons of what Trump has done and how it can be a threat to the Constitution and democracy, but nothing factual that can be used to impeach and remove Trump at the moment.

Paraphrase practice

Ms. Yancey states that technology allows for a new ways to communicate since it is unique for each individual and meant for others to read. Unfortunately, higher academics do not acknowledge social media as academically proper. At least it is known to have an effect on how students write and receive their grammar and spelling from. Ms. Yancey also states that professors disregard social communication for their own danger.

White Paper #2

In America, having money means you have power. With money, you can pay off all that college debt, buy a fancy car along with a huge mansion, and live a very easy life. Money is also a great tool to bribe people to do what you ask them to do. Today the affluent can influence politicians to block policies that they do not favor. I believe America is no longer a well-working, but a corrupt democracy since the rich and large corporations have a larger influence on policies and politicians.

It is more common for the affluent to their way from policymakers. In the Washington Post it states, “When only the affluent strongly support a proposed policy change, that policy is adopted 46 percent of the time; when only the middle-class strongly support a policy, that policy is adopted only 24 percent of the time” (Critics argued with our analysis of U.S. political inequality. Here are 5 ways they’re wrong.). This statistics comes to show that the upper class are more likely to get the policy they support than are the middle class. In a democracy, all people should be represented equally since a democratic is run by the people. Only a small proportion of the population are affluent, meaning that roughly 46% of policy changes that occur only benefits a small population of citizens. Majority of the American people are not seeing the policy changes only they want to occur 76% of the time.

In addition, there is an advantage for candidates with financial support. Noam Chomsky, a political activist, states, “Obama won over McCain primarily because the financial institutions liked him better so they poured money into his campaign much more than McCain” with the polls agreeing that the advertising gave Obama the advantage (Chomsky). This fact proves to show that money means power. In a true democracy, candidates are given an equal opportunity to express their political stance and voters vote based on what they believe is best for the country. With financial support, candidates have an advantage of getting potential voters’ recognition and then most will vote for a candidate because they have heard of them. A candidate with a great stance can lose to someone who does not have the greatest platform simply because of the money they have from large corporations to expand recognition.